Warren, Raskin Lead Call for Investigation of Defense Contractors’ Ties to Trump Administration Officials
“When Executive Branch officials determining immigration policy have a personal stake in their decision-making, they may be improperly influenced to enact policies that generate billions for their favored immigration contractors.”
Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) led a new probe calling on the Inspectors General (IG) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Defense (DoD) to investigate whether defense and immigration contractors are receiving lucrative contracts because of their ties to high-level Trump administration officials, including Tom Homan, the “Border Czar.”
Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Andy Kim (D-N.J.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), along with Representatives Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), and Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) joined in signing the letter.
“When Executive Branch officials determining immigration policy have a personal stake in their decision-making, they may be improperly influenced to enact policies that generate billions for their favored immigration contractors,” said the lawmakers.
Before the 2024 election, Homan, who previously ran a firm that helped contractors secure DHS contracts, allegedly accepted $50,000 in cash in exchange for helping certain companies win contracts. Since joining the Trump administration, Homan reportedly has participated in meetings with immigration contractors about contracts, potentially in violation of ethics rules. Some of the companies with ties to Homan have been short-listed to compete for lucrative contracts.
Other senior officials, like Stephen Miller, President Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff and Homeland Security Advisor, have financial and professional ties to private contractors who have profited from the administration's immigration agenda, including ties through stock investments, past lobbying and employment backgrounds, and campaign contributions.
For example, GEO Group, a former client of Mr. Homan, reported that it had entered new contracts worth over $130 million with ICE in 2025 alone. GEO also said it anticipated that increased detention “could generate between $500 million and $600 million” for the company each year, and increased deportation flights would generate $40 million to $50 million each year.
The letter asks that the Inspectors General investigate whether this windfall was in part due to the company’s ties to the administration. One of GEO Group’s subsidiaries, BI Incorporated, will benefit from contracts to supply ankle monitors and other electronic surveillance devices. Mr. Homan has also called for expanding ICE’s detention capacity, an area GEO specializes in and therefore is likely to receive contracts for. Additionally, David Venturella, who until recently served as GEO’s Vice President, is now a top ICE official overseeing immigration detention centers like those run by GEO.
Palantir, which offers data services for ICE to identify and target immigrants, and which has also secured contracts during this administration, is another example of these troubling connections. The company is a donor to the White House ballroom and its CEO donated to President Trump’s campaign. In addition, Mr. Miller holds between $100,000 and $250,000 worth of stock in Palantir and his senior policy advisor Kara Frederick owns between $50,000 and $100,000 in Palantir stock. The list of ties between Trump Administration officials and immigration contractors goes on.
“These apparent conflicts of interest risk the further erosion of public confidence in DoD and DHS at a time when taxpayer dollars are being funneled toward ICE practices that are increasingly regarded as inhumane,” concluded the lawmakers.
The coalition urged the IGs to open an investigation into the matter, including into whether Homan’s participation in the contracting process violates federal ethics laws, whether other Trump administration officials with financial or personal ties to contractors have helped them secure contracts, and whether any immigration-related contracts have bypassed the standard bidding process.
###
Next Article Previous Article