October 15, 2025

Warren, Sanders, Wyden, Blumenthal, Merkley Question YouTube, Google on Potential Quid-Pro-Quo Settlement With Trump Administration

Senators sound alarm after YouTube settled Trump lawsuit in the midst of antitrust lawsuit by DOJ

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) questioned Google CEO Sundar Pichai and YouTube CEO Neal Mohan regarding whether Google’s recent $22 million settlement with President Trump represented a quid-pro-quo agreement in exchange for favors from his administration. Donald Trump will reportedly host a fundraising dinner tonight for his new White House ballroom, where the $22 million from Google-owned YouTube’s settlement is set to flow.

President Donald Trump, in his capacity as a private citizen, sued YouTube — alleging that YouTube engaged in unlawful censorship when it banned him from its platform following the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Legal experts have characterized the lawsuit as “likely doomed from the start.” YouTube nevertheless settled the lawsuit for $22 million last month, while its parent company, Google, is in the midst of an antitrust lawsuit brought by President Trump’s Department of Justice — raising questions about a potential quid-pro-quo agreement involving the settlement.

“If …YouTube settled President Trump’s legally dubious lawsuit to discourage the President’s Justice Department from appealing a ruling favorable to Google, the company and its executives may have run afoul of the law,” warned the lawmakers.

The Senators are sounding the alarm following a concerning pattern of events surrounding the settlement and its potential tie to the Trump administration’s antitrust litigation against Google.

On September 2, a federal judge handed down a favorable antitrust penalties ruling for Google in the online search monopoly case, ordering remedies that have been characterized as “almost a best-case scenario” for the company. The Trump administration’s DOJ will decide whether to appeal after entry of the final judgment. Just two days after the favorable ruling, Trump referenced Google’s case while hosting Google and other Big Tech executives at the White House. In response, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said: “appreciate that your administration had a constructive dialogue, and we were able to get it to some resolution.” And on September 29, YouTube agreed to settle Trump’s dubious lawsuit, with $22 million flowing to Trump’s new luxury White House ballroom.

“The public deserves to know what ‘constructive dialogue’ the Trump administration and Google had, given that Google and the Trump administration are opposing parties in the antitrust case, and whether this dialogue was in any way connected to YouTube’s settlement with President Trump,” wrote the lawmakers. “Specifically, the public deserves to know whether YouTube’s settlement will influence the Trump Justice Department’s decision regarding whether to appeal and seek the stricter remedies DOJ had originally sought against Google.”

In August, the lawmakers warned that a settlement in exchange for favorable action by the administration in other matters, could be a violation of federal anti-bribery laws and related state laws. Now, the senators are asking Google and YouTube a series of questions in order to inform their legislative activity regarding antitrust matters, government ethics, and anti-corruption laws — including legislation to crack down on the risk of quid-pro-quo arrangements between the President and private companies that donate to organizations benefitting the President.

In addition to Big Tech companies, media companies have also agreed to deals to settle lawsuits brought by President Trump, including ABC News’ $15 million deal and Paramount’s agreement to pay $16 million to his future Presidential Library, after which the Trump administration approved Paramount and Skydance’s multi-billion-dollar merger.

Senator Warren has led the charge to determine if companies are attempting to bribe President Trump in exchange for approval of their mergers and has fought relentlessly against President Trump's corruption:

On October 10, 2025, Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) questioned Skydance’s refusal to address President Donald Trump’s reported secret side deal.
On September 30, 2025, Senator Warren joined Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.) in hosting a spotlight forum about President Trump and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr's abuse of government authority to restrict First Amendment-protected speech and independent, fact-based news reporting.
On September 23, 2025, Senator Warren, along with Senators Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), pressed broadcasters Nexstar and Sinclair for answers as to why Jimmy Kimmel was pulled off the air.
On September 23, 2025, Senator Warren released a statement after Nexstar Media Group’s and Sinclair’s decisions to continue to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! on ABC affiliate stations.
On August 1, Senator Warren released a statement in response to Paramount’s and Skydance’s responses to her letters to each of the companies, describing the responses as “dodgy” and calling for “a full, independent investigation” into whether the companies or their executives engaged in any criminal behavior connected to the approval of the companies’ multi-billion-dollar merger.
On July 24, Senator Warren responded to the Trump administration’s approval of the Paramount-Skydance megamerger, saying “bribery is illegal no matter who is president.”
On July 23, Senator Warren published an op-ed in Variety: “Elizabeth Warren on Colbert 'Late Show' Cancellation: Is the Paramount Trump Payoff a Bribe?”
On July 21, Senators Warren, Sanders (I-Vt.), and Wyden (D-Ore.) pressed David Ellison, CEO of Skydance, about reports of a secret deal between Skydance and President Trump—and how it may be related to Paramount’s recent multi-million-dollar settlement agreement with Trump.
On July 17, Senators Warren and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), along with Representatives Jared Moskowitz (D-Fla.), Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), Melanie Stansbury (D-N.M.), and lawmakers in Congress, unveiled the Presidential Library Anti-Corruption Act to close loopholes that allow presidential libraries to be used as tools for corruption and bribery.
On July 15, Senator Warren released a new report exposing how companies, special interests, and foreign governments may be pledging donations to President Trump’s future Presidential Library as a corrupt tool to secure favorable outcomes from his administration.
On July 2, Senator Warren called for an investigation into Paramount’s settlement with Trump.
On May 19, Senators Warren, Sanders, and Wyden wrote to Shari Redstone, Chair of Paramount, with concerns regarding whether Paramount may be engaging in potentially illegal conduct involving the Trump Administration in exchange for approval of its megamerger with Skydance.

###